Qualified
retirement plans provide tax deductible benefits for
employers and employees, as well as an opportunity for
significant savings for the post-retirement years. But these
plans require adherence to numerous governmental
regulations, and there are costs involved in the
establishment and ongoing maintenance of the plan.
The list of expenses includes the preparation of plan
documents, recordkeeping and government reporting, to name
just a few. It is important that these functions be carried
out by trained professionals who are familiar with the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Department of Labor (DOL)
rules and regulations for qualified plans.
Many of these expenses are permitted to be paid from the
assets of the plan, although certain expenses must be paid
by the sponsoring employer. In hard economic times,
employers who have been footing the bill for administrative
expenses may choose to reconsider and have some of the fees
paid from the plan assets.
Expenses Borne By Employer
The DOL does not permit expenses which relate to "settlor
functions" to be paid from the plan assets. A "settlor
function" is an independent business activity or decision of
the employer. These activities are thought to primarily
benefit the employer.
Expenses such as the following cannot be paid from plan
assets, although they are deductible as ordinary business
expenses:
- Plan design expenses, such as studies of the plan's
feasibility and projections;
- Preparation of the initial plan document;
- Preparation of voluntary plan amendments (required
amendments due to law changes may be paid from plan
assets); and
- Certain plan termination fees.
Example: The XYZ Company
established a 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2006. The
cost for preparation of the documents to establish the plan
is a business expense that must be paid by the employer and
not the plan. In 2009 the company was informed that the plan
had to be restated for EGTRRA (the Economic Growth and Tax
Relief Reconciliation Act) which was enacted in 2001 and
other laws that were passed since that time. Because the
restated document is required by a change in the law and not
a voluntary amendment instituted by the employer, the
restatement fee can be charged to participants' accounts
under the plan if the employer chooses not to pay that cost.
Administrative Expenses Payable From
Plan Assets
If the employer wishes, fees related to the
administration of the plan can generally be paid by the plan
if they are prudent and reasonable and permitted under the
plan document. Reasonable administrative costs that may be
charged to plan participants include the following:
- Participant recordkeeping;
- Nondiscrimination and top heavy testing;
- Preparation and distribution of benefit statements;
- Preparation of Form 5500 and schedules;
- Accountant's audit report required for large plans
(those with over 100 participants);
- Summary Annual Reports;
- Notices for automatic enrollment, default investments
and safe harbor 401(k) plans (where applicable);
- Expenses for computing benefit payments and processing
loans;
- Plan amendments/restatements required by law changes
or new regulations;
- IRS determination letter requests;
- Purchase of trustees' fidelity bond;
- Trustee fees;
- Investment management fees; and
- Fees to process participant enrollment and investment
elections.
One issue to consider when deciding if a fee should be
paid from the plan assets is the size of the plan relative
to the amount of the fee. Allocating a $1,500 fee among 100
participants with total plan assets of $1,000,000 will have
much less of an impact than if the plan has only 10
participants with assets of $100,000.
The employer, as a fiduciary of the plan, is required to
monitor plan expenses to insure that they are reasonable and
prudent.
Allocation Methods
Once it's been established that a fee can properly be
paid by the plan, the method of allocating the fee must be
determined. There are several alternatives outlined below.
Allocate Fee to Specific
Participant
The fairest method for allocating certain service fees is
to charge them against the account of the participant
involved in the transaction or service, although such fees
can be allocated to the entire plan. Participants should be
informed of the amount of the fee in advance. The following
fees are typically charged to the affected participant's
account:
- Fees to prepare distribution election and consent
forms;
- Hardship withdrawal expenses;
- Fees to prepare participant loan documents and the
annual loan administration expenses; and
- Qualified Domestic Relation Order (QDRO) determination
and processing fees.
Pro Rata or Per Capita Allocation
Plan expenses that are not being charged to a specific
participant's account can be allocated to all plan
participants on either a "pro rata" or a "per capita" basis.
A pro rata allocation is done proportionately based on
account balances. Per capita means that the amount is
allocated equally based on the number of participants in the
plan. Here is an example of how a $1,000 fee would be
allocated under each method:
| A |
$60,000 |
$600 |
$250 |
| B |
20,000 |
200 |
250 |
| C |
15,000 |
150 |
250 |
| D |
5,000 |
50 |
250 |
| Total |
$100,000 |
$1,000 |
$1,000 |
As you can see, the participant with the highest account
balance would have the largest fee deducted under the pro
rata method.
DOL rules require that the allocation method chosen be
prudent and solely in the interest of all participants. It
must have a rational basis, with some reasonable
relationship to the services provided. It may be more
appropriate to allocate certain investment fees pro rata
based on account balances, while some administrative fees
may be more appropriately allocated per capita, where each
participant pays the same amount. It depends on the facts
and circumstances of each situation, with prudence and
reasonableness being the primary considerations.
The DOL has stated that it could be reasonable to treat
terminated employees differently than active employees when
it comes to the allocation of plan expenses. This may be
more easily justified where the terminated employee had a
choice and elected to remain in the plan, as compared to the
situation where terminees cannot receive a distribution
until reaching normal retirement age.
Using Forfeitures to Pay
Expenses
Some plans provide that allowable expenses may be paid
from the forfeiture account (accumulated from employees who
terminated employment without full vesting). The impact that
this will have depends on how forfeitures are treated under
the terms of the plan. If forfeitures are used to offset
employer contributions, such as matching contributions in a
401(k) plan, it's as if the employer were paying the expense
because the reduced forfeitures will likely result in
additional employer contributions. But if the forfeitures
are allocated to remaining participants, then it's as if the
participants are paying the fee, due to the reduced
forfeiture allocation.
Defined Benefit Plans
Defined benefit plans may also pay expenses from plan
assets, but participants' benefits will not be reduced as a
result. That's because the benefits are stipulated under the
terms of the plan, and paying expenses from the plan would
only reduce the assets available to pay benefits, which
could increase the employer's funding obligation. However,
where investments have outperformed actuarial assumptions
creating overfunding, paying expenses from the plan may be
desirable.
Plan Document and Disclosure
Requirements
Expenses may only be paid from the plan assets if the
plan document authorizes plan expense payments or is silent
on the payment of expenses. The document may contain
specific details for the payment and allocation of plan
expenses, although it is not required to provide such
detail. Plan documents that specifically prohibit the
payment of expenses by the plan may be amended prospectively
to remove this provision and allow the plan to pay expenses
in the future. However, the expenses of this amendment must
be paid by the employer as a voluntary amendment.
Participants need to be informed if plan expenses can be
deducted from their accounts. Such information should be
included in the Summary Plan Description (SPD) which is
required to be distributed to each employee upon entering
the plan. Specific details including the amount of and
method for allocating the various types of expenses should
be included.
DOL Proposals
Last year the DOL proposed fiduciary disclosure
requirements for participant-directed accounts which would
require additional information to be provided about
investment options and more detailed information about fees.
The rules were supposed to have been effective January 1,
2009, but it is now uncertain when, or if, this regulation
will be finalized.
Another DOL proposed regulation concerns the contracts or
arrangements between the plan fiduciary and a service
provider. Under the proposal, in order for a service
provider's fee to be paid by the plan without resulting in a
prohibited transaction, the contract must be in writing and
disclose the fees to be paid. In addition, the service
provider must disclose any relationship it has with other
parties that could create a conflict of interest.
Although it is unclear when, or if, this regulation will
be finalized, it may be advisable to adhere to a service
provider disclosure policy to prevent violations of the
fiduciary and prohibited transaction rules under ERISA.
One DOL change that has been finalized is the increased
reporting of fees paid to service providers on Schedule C of
Form 5500 for large plans, effective for plan years
beginning in 2009.
Conclusion
Employers have the option of paying certain expenses of a
qualified plan from the business or from the assets of the
plan, in which case the plan participants share the burden
of such costs. The DOL has provided rules to determine which
expenses may be paid by the plan and the allowable
allocation methods among participants' accounts.
The plan document must allow the plan to pay reasonable
expenses in order for it to take place, and the expense
policy must be communicated to employees through the SPD.
Recent DOL proposals seek to increase disclosure of plan
expense information to participants, fiduciaries and the
DOL.
|